The contention surrounding the motion picture "Kerala Story" has sparked a discussion regarding the freedom of articulation and the depiction of reality in the artistic domain. Dr. Shashi Tharoor, the Member of Parliament for Thiruvananthapuram, affiliated with the Indian National Congress, expressed his opinion on the matter, stating that although he does not support the banning of the movie, the individuals from Kerala possess the right to object to the inaccurate representation of their reality.
Let me stress, I am not calling for a ban on the film. Freedom of expression does not cease to be valuable just because it can be misused. But Keralites have every right to say loud & clear that this is a misrepresentation of our reality. https://t.co/sEIG91mjSP
The movie portrays alleged forced conversions to Islam and involvement in ISIS's terrorist activities in Syria, leading to outrage on various social media platforms. Critics claimed that it presents a negative and erroneous image of the state and its inhabitants.
As with any form of art, the interpretation and depiction of reality are subjective and subject to censure. While freedom of expression is an essential right, it must be exercised with prudence and sensitivity. The distinction between artistic expression and misrepresentation can be indistinct, and it is crucial for artists to acknowledge the impact their work may have on the communities they portray.
The controversy regarding "Kerala Story" highlights the significance of a nuanced approach to freedom of expression, one that acknowledges the value of artistic expression while respecting the diversity and intricacy of the communities it represents. As a society, we must endeavor to promote dialogue and open communication to achieve a comprehensive understanding of our shared reality.
.gif)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment
Share your response